Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you read more, you will learn more about this decision made by the courts.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It will actually be valuable for you to go for the services of a top lawyer in the event that you want to present such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.